<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Profiled in Wired, on G4 tonight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ryanblock.com/2008/03/profiled-in-wired-on-g4-tonight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ryanblock.com/2008/03/profiled-in-wired-on-g4-tonight/</link>
	<description>Editor and technology critic in the midst of founding a new web startup: gdgt.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 03:59:37 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Corey</title>
		<link>http://ryanblock.com/2008/03/profiled-in-wired-on-g4-tonight/#comment-96609</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Corey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 14:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=773#comment-96609</guid>
		<description>Give &#039;em hell, Block. The article rocked!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Give &#8216;em hell, Block. The article rocked!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tayo</title>
		<link>http://ryanblock.com/2008/03/profiled-in-wired-on-g4-tonight/#comment-69965</link>
		<dc:creator>Tayo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 09:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=773#comment-69965</guid>
		<description>Ryan,

You might want to avoid using words like &quot;passé&quot; and &quot;trite&quot; if you don&#039;t want to come off as an elitist. You have done a good job maintaining a professional attitude towards the issue, don&#039;t ruin it with your voice and verbiage on your own blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan,</p>
<p>You might want to avoid using words like &#8220;passé&#8221; and &#8220;trite&#8221; if you don&#8217;t want to come off as an elitist. You have done a good job maintaining a professional attitude towards the issue, don&#8217;t ruin it with your voice and verbiage on your own blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://ryanblock.com/2008/03/profiled-in-wired-on-g4-tonight/#comment-69671</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=773#comment-69671</guid>
		<description>Ew, G4?  You&#039;re better than that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ew, G4?  You&#8217;re better than that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TRiP</title>
		<link>http://ryanblock.com/2008/03/profiled-in-wired-on-g4-tonight/#comment-69309</link>
		<dc:creator>TRiP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 18:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=773#comment-69309</guid>
		<description>Ryan,
Choosing to stay out of/above it while Gizmodo attempted (poorly) to justify their behavior yet again, came off good for you. I stopped hitting Gizmodo a while back. Still, I was glad I read the piece. The more I hear about them the more they sound like a sideshow spun out of control. Amusing to watch maybe, but their days of being taken seriously are behind them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan,<br />
Choosing to stay out of/above it while Gizmodo attempted (poorly) to justify their behavior yet again, came off good for you. I stopped hitting Gizmodo a while back. Still, I was glad I read the piece. The more I hear about them the more they sound like a sideshow spun out of control. Amusing to watch maybe, but their days of being taken seriously are behind them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vance</title>
		<link>http://ryanblock.com/2008/03/profiled-in-wired-on-g4-tonight/#comment-68789</link>
		<dc:creator>Vance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 22:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=773#comment-68789</guid>
		<description>Yes, right, I did not mean it was bad publicity, per se, only that this might be a case where no matter what they write, it is likely all good for Engadget.

BTW, entirely OT, I am getting into the Engadget HD podcast now that I have a new TV, and wanted to let you know that the guys do a good job.  Almost up to your&#039;s and Peter&#039;s standards.  You should consider doing a weekly podcast with Veronica, it would be an instant hit!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, right, I did not mean it was bad publicity, per se, only that this might be a case where no matter what they write, it is likely all good for Engadget.</p>
<p>BTW, entirely OT, I am getting into the Engadget HD podcast now that I have a new TV, and wanted to let you know that the guys do a good job.  Almost up to your&#8217;s and Peter&#8217;s standards.  You should consider doing a weekly podcast with Veronica, it would be an instant hit!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Block</title>
		<link>http://ryanblock.com/2008/03/profiled-in-wired-on-g4-tonight/#comment-68653</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Block</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=773#comment-68653</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think it&#039;s bad publicity, just trite journalism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s bad publicity, just trite journalism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vance</title>
		<link>http://ryanblock.com/2008/03/profiled-in-wired-on-g4-tonight/#comment-68649</link>
		<dc:creator>Vance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=773#comment-68649</guid>
		<description>Despite your blog post a few days ago, I do think this falls into the &quot;there is no bad publicity&quot; category.  While the typical Wired reader is likely aware of Engadget, those that weren&#039;t definitely are now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite your blog post a few days ago, I do think this falls into the &#8220;there is no bad publicity&#8221; category.  While the typical Wired reader is likely aware of Engadget, those that weren&#8217;t definitely are now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arlo</title>
		<link>http://ryanblock.com/2008/03/profiled-in-wired-on-g4-tonight/#comment-68031</link>
		<dc:creator>Arlo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 18:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=773#comment-68031</guid>
		<description>I read the article last night, it was informative and cast a good light on your and your organization.  Nice pic, too.  I did pick up on the weight that your (and GM&#039;s) sites have in the industry.  Not quite to the power you mention above, but it trickled through the rivalry focus a little.

I think Wired is angling more towards gamer-y readers anyway.  The colors, design, wacky, sometimes confusing, infographics- people who really love the WWF nature of the biz.  Any publicity is good publicity, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the article last night, it was informative and cast a good light on your and your organization.  Nice pic, too.  I did pick up on the weight that your (and GM&#8217;s) sites have in the industry.  Not quite to the power you mention above, but it trickled through the rivalry focus a little.</p>
<p>I think Wired is angling more towards gamer-y readers anyway.  The colors, design, wacky, sometimes confusing, infographics- people who really love the WWF nature of the biz.  Any publicity is good publicity, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin</title>
		<link>http://ryanblock.com/2008/03/profiled-in-wired-on-g4-tonight/#comment-68023</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 17:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=773#comment-68023</guid>
		<description>Hey Ryan,

Gavin from AOTS here. Just read the Wired article and I totally agree with you. It&#039;s fascinating to see Wired kinda go least common denominator on the whole thing.

Keep up the awesome work and thanks for coming on the show (again!).

-G</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Ryan,</p>
<p>Gavin from AOTS here. Just read the Wired article and I totally agree with you. It&#8217;s fascinating to see Wired kinda go least common denominator on the whole thing.</p>
<p>Keep up the awesome work and thanks for coming on the show (again!).</p>
<p>-G</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://ryanblock.com/2008/03/profiled-in-wired-on-g4-tonight/#comment-67991</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 13:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=773#comment-67991</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s fine, let WIRED use the &quot;frat boys with gadget&quot; angle, you need to save the real story for yourself and Pete Rojas in order to author a proper book anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s fine, let WIRED use the &#8220;frat boys with gadget&#8221; angle, you need to save the real story for yourself and Pete Rojas in order to author a proper book anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
