<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Harry McCracken leaving to start a new site</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ryanblock.com/2008/05/harry-mccracken-leaving-to-start-a-new-site/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ryanblock.com/2008/05/harry-mccracken-leaving-to-start-a-new-site/</link>
	<description>Editor and technology critic in the midst of founding a new web startup: gdgt.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 15:44:30 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://ryanblock.com/2008/05/harry-mccracken-leaving-to-start-a-new-site/#comment-102135</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 20:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=835#comment-102135</guid>
		<description>Hehe, I like were Vance is going with this...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hehe, I like were Vance is going with this&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vance</title>
		<link>http://ryanblock.com/2008/05/harry-mccracken-leaving-to-start-a-new-site/#comment-102107</link>
		<dc:creator>Vance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 16:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=835#comment-102107</guid>
		<description>As much as I would love an Engadget Magazine, I think it is a good move to stay out of that field.  But, one lateral expansion that really could be worth the effort is to crank up the Engadget Podcast again, but maybe in a different format.  Possibly TWIT-like with guests or maybe interviews with tech luminaries.  I loved the casualness of you and Peter just covering the stories, but I could really see a synergy with a high-profile, upscale podcast, either audio or video.  You are good at that type of thing and have the clout to bring in some solid guests.  And, I could suggest a very conveniently located and well-known co-host with experience in such things . . . (you KNOW you guys have talked about it!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much as I would love an Engadget Magazine, I think it is a good move to stay out of that field.  But, one lateral expansion that really could be worth the effort is to crank up the Engadget Podcast again, but maybe in a different format.  Possibly TWIT-like with guests or maybe interviews with tech luminaries.  I loved the casualness of you and Peter just covering the stories, but I could really see a synergy with a high-profile, upscale podcast, either audio or video.  You are good at that type of thing and have the clout to bring in some solid guests.  And, I could suggest a very conveniently located and well-known co-host with experience in such things . . . (you KNOW you guys have talked about it!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Block</title>
		<link>http://ryanblock.com/2008/05/harry-mccracken-leaving-to-start-a-new-site/#comment-101937</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Block</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 01:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=835#comment-101937</guid>
		<description>Not sure there&#039;s any need -- we&#039;ve managed to leverage OUR medium very well. I think the mistake most brands make is they see a modicum of success and believe they can parlay it horizontally. I&#039;d rather we just spend our time and resources continuing to better Engadget&#039;s online presence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure there&#8217;s any need &#8212; we&#8217;ve managed to leverage OUR medium very well. I think the mistake most brands make is they see a modicum of success and believe they can parlay it horizontally. I&#8217;d rather we just spend our time and resources continuing to better Engadget&#8217;s online presence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://ryanblock.com/2008/05/harry-mccracken-leaving-to-start-a-new-site/#comment-101903</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 21:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=835#comment-101903</guid>
		<description>&quot;PC World... really leverages the advantages of the medium..&quot;

Based on that, will we ever see an Engadget print magazine? No so much just electronic devices, but more a lifestyle magazine, people first, gadgets in action ( or peril? ) second. It could be what Rolling Stone used to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;PC World&#8230; really leverages the advantages of the medium..&#8221;</p>
<p>Based on that, will we ever see an Engadget print magazine? No so much just electronic devices, but more a lifestyle magazine, people first, gadgets in action ( or peril? ) second. It could be what Rolling Stone used to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Block</title>
		<link>http://ryanblock.com/2008/05/harry-mccracken-leaving-to-start-a-new-site/#comment-101867</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Block</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 17:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=835#comment-101867</guid>
		<description>PC World is hardly sinking, and some print -- the stuff that really leverages the advantages of the medium -- will remain indefinitely. In-depth, long-form editorial hasn&#039;t really transitioned to the web, barring a select few sites (Slate comes to mind), but I think Harry&#039;s doing the smart thing for him: trying something new and making it his own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PC World is hardly sinking, and some print &#8212; the stuff that really leverages the advantages of the medium &#8212; will remain indefinitely. In-depth, long-form editorial hasn&#8217;t really transitioned to the web, barring a select few sites (Slate comes to mind), but I think Harry&#8217;s doing the smart thing for him: trying something new and making it his own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vance</title>
		<link>http://ryanblock.com/2008/05/harry-mccracken-leaving-to-start-a-new-site/#comment-101863</link>
		<dc:creator>Vance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 15:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=835#comment-101863</guid>
		<description>Ryan, do you see this as indicative of shift away from print (if there IS such a shift) that was discussed on TWIT a while back?  Is he jumping off a sinking ship?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan, do you see this as indicative of shift away from print (if there IS such a shift) that was discussed on TWIT a while back?  Is he jumping off a sinking ship?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://ryanblock.com/2008/05/harry-mccracken-leaving-to-start-a-new-site/#comment-101843</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 13:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/?p=835#comment-101843</guid>
		<description>I can only scratch my head and wonder what kind of epic demonry this man is going to unleash unto the world...

Also, great use of the word titan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can only scratch my head and wonder what kind of epic demonry this man is going to unleash unto the world&#8230;</p>
<p>Also, great use of the word titan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

