<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ryan Block &#187; Last Year&#8217;s Model</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ryanblock.com/tag/last-years-model/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ryanblock.com</link>
	<description>Editor and technology critic in the midst of founding a new web startup: gdgt.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 04:38:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Last Year&#8217;s Model is just fine with me</title>
		<link>http://ryanblock.com/2009/05/last-years-model-is-just-fine-with-me/</link>
		<comments>http://ryanblock.com/2009/05/last-years-model-is-just-fine-with-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 03:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Block</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Last Year's Model]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryanblock.com/?p=1500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not that we need any more reasons to spurn conspicuous consumption these days, but I&#8217;m a big proponent of the message behind Last Year&#8217;s Model. It&#8217;s simple and to the point: do you really need a new gadget? I&#8217;d be willing to be more often than not the answer is probably no. Maybe that&#8217;s a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1499" title="last-years-model" src="http://ryanblock.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/last-years-model.jpg" alt="last-years-model" width="160" height="90" />Not that we need any more reasons to spurn conspicuous consumption these days, but I&#8217;m a big proponent of the message behind <a href="http://lastyearsmodel.org/">Last Year&#8217;s Model</a>. It&#8217;s simple and to the point: do you really need a new gadget? I&#8217;d be willing to be more often than not the answer is probably <em>no</em>.</p>
<p>Maybe that&#8217;s a little surprising coming from someone so entrenched in the gadget space, but I&#8217;ve actually been discouraging most upgrading for years (namely because I find people typically upgrade for the sake of upgrading). When it comes to buying new kit, I think there are actually a few important things one should take into account:</p>
<ul>
<li>Companies love to issue seasonal gadget upgrades &#8212; which I often refer to as &#8220;incremental differentiation.&#8221; We should be more critical of being oversold on what often amounts to extremely minor product updates (in the grand scheme of things).<span id="more-1500"></span></li>
<li>Thanks to an increasing stasis in hardware specs and staying power by way of firmware updates (think Xbox 360 + NXE, iPhone + firmware 2.0 / 3.0) and hacks built by the community, people have really begun to lack a compelling reason to upgrade their devices as often as they did just a few years ago. (And yes, this totally freaks out a lot of companies who don&#8217;t yet know how to adapt.)</li>
<li>It&#8217;s hard and time consuming to research, identify, and buy devices and systems that work well and get the job done &#8212; so when you do, you should appreciate them all the more.</li>
</ul>
<div style="float: right; display: block;"><script type="text/javascript">// < ![CDATA[
var gdgt_url = 'http://gdgt.com/microsoft/wheel-mouse/optical/';var gdgt_style = 'full';
// ]]&gt;</script></p>
<p><script src="http://media.gdgt.com/api/js/addtolist.js" type="text/javascript"></script></div>
<p>So, do you really need that next device? Maybe so, but for whatever it&#8217;s worth, I used my last digital camera for years &#8212; and through many, many product updates &#8212; and eventually shot over 10,000 images on it. (I would probably  be using it to this day had I not dropped and broken it.) Likewise, my HDTV is a few years old now, and my desktop PC is almost five &#8212; both still work so damned well the idea of an &#8220;upgrade&#8221; seems kind of silly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ryanblock.com/2009/05/last-years-model-is-just-fine-with-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

